Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:24:05 +0200
From:      =?windows-1252?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= <dumbbell@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Port: x11-servers/xorg-server
Message-ID:  <5443F3B5.9080903@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1u6VO=FdSqmTpm%2Bj6y_rCeaLzWmvQA9u16TirfLGinAuA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <5414A4B6.5010706@UToledo.edu> <5416B1FE.1010801@dumbbell.fr> <1411306792093-5950838.post@n5.nabble.com> <CAEJt7hYfgJ594hnzdu%2BNO7duh7nH6OXu1YBi6USyMVSBH48X2Q@mail.gmail.com> <1411317698961-5950873.post@n5.nabble.com> <541F2CA4.6@hiwaay.net> <1411341142791-5950945.post@n5.nabble.com> <541F64A4.3030002@hiwaay.net> <542096D6.2000403@astart.com> <CAN6yY1u6VO=FdSqmTpm%2Bj6y_rCeaLzWmvQA9u16TirfLGinAuA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--QiKHkHl3JK1QHWeNAcmLquboWJde2A7qi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 23.09.2014 00:47, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Looks to me like there should be a note to this effect on the wiki, at =
the
> very least. It's a pretty odd situation. If this happened in the standa=
rd
> ports system, it would just result in a PORT_REVISION bump. Could that =
be
> done to those packages in the NEW_XORG repo?

This problem is solved now that WITH_NEW_XORG is on its way out.

I just want to explain why we couldn't have different PORT_REVISION for
the WITH_NEW_XORG flavour and the "normal" flavour packages. Both
packages build and publication aren't particularily synchronized. So for
example, during day #1, we have _5 for the non-WITH_NEW_XORG package and
_6 for the WITH_NEW_XORG package. We make some updates and increment to
_7/_8 respectively. But we have no control on which will appear first in
the repositories: a user could get the wrong one and be in the same
situation you had. A better solution would be priorities or package
pinning, but we don't have that yet.

--=20
Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron


--QiKHkHl3JK1QHWeNAcmLquboWJde2A7qi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Wokh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QiKHkHl3JK1QHWeNAcmLquboWJde2A7qi--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5443F3B5.9080903>