Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 03:49:55 +0200 From: Tomek CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386) Message-ID: <CAFYkXj=AaVnx0Ps0RX-QWSw=4=v=Hf13ASJKvSLKawQyZ8D0QA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfobbiuihpEZ9sUV_LwvhNpeLP6Y1nxfXUidqCOhiMejYg@mail.gmail.com> References: <aaa3e005-5f72-f422-56b1-932842379e15@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfobbiuihpEZ9sUV_LwvhNpeLP6Y1nxfXUidqCOhiMejYg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 10:14=E2=80=AFPM Warner Losh wrote: > https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/envi= sioning-future-simplified-architecture.html > > contains Intel's plans for the future. They have removed support for boot= ing > 16/32-bit and non-UEFI from their firmware as of 2020... I saw that info too.. but are we going to allow Intel dictate future of computers and supported platforms to The FreeBSD Project? I am convinced that everyone will move to RISC-V pretty soon anyway :-) --=20 CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXj=AaVnx0Ps0RX-QWSw=4=v=Hf13ASJKvSLKawQyZ8D0QA>