Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:40:31 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, greg@unrelenting.technology Cc: FreeBSD X11 mailing list <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Graphics Team Meeting notes from 2018-10-17 Message-ID: <ca19293c-8470-d9e2-f955-f022d1ceffca@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfqwndeK8eOPL8fzZ-BACVo7aAoHH0ADzmu946MAR7iTZA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANCZdfrGk3MF3FXLnUtVZPizrYHJCABd2b=Xn8NjbOL3qzQ3Yg@mail.gmail.com> <1539971696.1750.0@smtp.migadu.com> <CANCZdfqwndeK8eOPL8fzZ-BACVo7aAoHH0ADzmu946MAR7iTZA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/19/18 10:54 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:55 AM Greg V <greg@unrelenting.technology> wrote: > >> Maybe users should be able to choose between mesa-stable and mesa-dev? >> >> I'm not sure if there's a good way to do it in the current >> ports/packages system though. >> > > I'm not sure doing something people don't think will work right before a > release is a winning strategy. Having multiple mesa versions have been discussed in the past, at least when we had KMS and non-KMS graphics at the same time, if memory serves me. The problem has always been that there is no way in the ports infrastructure to specify a dependency on one out of many different versions of ports, at least to my knowledge. Regards -- Niclas Zeising
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ca19293c-8470-d9e2-f955-f022d1ceffca>