Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 16:14:43 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ulrich_Sp=C3=B6rlein?= <uqs@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>, git@freebsd.org, mat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports 2020Q3 branch not present? Message-ID: <CAJ9axoRRNm9y5Ws-2dWmr=%2BGiH3ZM0tV=mxe0Sj%2B9Sw8dBr9zA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfr843KeRyYNgiLDDskEanS=8%2Bj6cUWPXY6gJP_Rx_zk5g@mail.gmail.com> References: <20200710212416.GA89164@freefall.freebsd.org> <20200711093659.GA16439@acme.spoerlein.net> <20200711205804.GA22050@freefall.freebsd.org> <CANCZdfr843KeRyYNgiLDDskEanS=8%2Bj6cUWPXY6gJP_Rx_zk5g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 6:35 AM Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 2:58 PM Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Hmm, so currently the quarterly (and older releng) branches are directly >> under >> the "remotes" origin, just like master itself. This makes switching >> between >> branches easy, which comes in handy for MFHs I think. >> > > They are just like the stable branches in the src tree (or somewhat > similar), so I think they should be the same, and pulled by default. While > they are quarterly, the traffic on them is smaller than a typical stable > branch in src, so it's not a huge amount of extra revisions. > > The only way to find the size is to pull with and without them and observe > the difference. > > portmgr should weigh in on where these branches should end up. Currently I'm dumping them in refs/heads/20xxQy (not pushed yet, needs a fix), because having them called refs/heads/branches/2020Q1 is a bit weird as the "branches" is rather redundant. Cheers Uli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ9axoRRNm9y5Ws-2dWmr=%2BGiH3ZM0tV=mxe0Sj%2B9Sw8dBr9zA>