Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:27:20 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: "Samuel J. Greear" <sjg@evilcode.net> Cc: "hackers@freebsd.org" <hackers@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL benchmarks (now with Linux numbers) Message-ID: <CAF-QHFX4JThkm_Xd3Ya4NZw-iHtNAvfebksLF1bPJ%2BDLB6L8-g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANY-Wm9%2BZzavsJqZ=4_66gZxt7ehh%2BAZTbeAZxAz7Tkg=syabA@mail.gmail.com> References: <b1732c99-eec2-4097-ad9c-f58979addf9f@email.android.com> <4F45AB76.5050201@FreeBSD.org> <CANY-Wm9%2BZzavsJqZ=4_66gZxt7ehh%2BAZTbeAZxAz7Tkg=syabA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> On 02/22/2012 01:42, Ivan Voras wrote: >> > The Dragonfly team has recently liberated their VM from the giant lock >> > and there are some interesting benchmarks comparing it to FreeBSD 9 and a >> > derivative of RedHat Enterprise Linux: > I just saw this, so I thought I would mention -- DragonFly was not doing a > great job allocating pv entries rapidly, which is needed during PostgreSQL > warm up -- This made shm_use_phys appear very effective. It only makes 1-2% > difference now on DragonFly, and only 1-2% difference on FreeBSD. Great! Do you have a link to the updated results?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF-QHFX4JThkm_Xd3Ya4NZw-iHtNAvfebksLF1bPJ%2BDLB6L8-g>