Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 11:29:29 -0800 From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> To: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Option vs. flavor? Message-ID: <00619a7a-a812-1eac-bdb7-5cecfb891758@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOc73CAe03AuLsgSvw1TfV7Ke9qLvGJtHpqowvF=KPnMOxOjxg@mail.gmail.com> References: <ee10fa7f-9107-1c35-8540-ff34d306865d@rawbw.com> <20171216142849.GL10752@graf.pompo.net> <CAOc73CAe03AuLsgSvw1TfV7Ke9qLvGJtHpqowvF=KPnMOxOjxg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/16/17 11:14, Ben Woods wrote: > The original post was requesting that the port make fetch only downloads > the data conditionally based on the option. Not sure how possible that is. Yes, I was in doubt too. sub-packages will probably always fetch and build, and I am trying to avoid that. So I would just stick to flavor. @withData should be a virtual flavor, that can be built on demand. IMO, this makes most sense. Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00619a7a-a812-1eac-bdb7-5cecfb891758>