Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:59:08 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Proposal: do not show up the dialog(1) by default? Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK0CnHQmXvgPRKe_k1Bx_SRmA9xm=tD7Ms4ociPbE16Q5A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ6GKoX5-Q5Vry=2HE-5mf6XYQgze40hyYO-prnVK%2Bzr6A@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130523054541.GH96836@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CA%2BtpaK2tB=Xteo2y7C80AMf2mwGxPCS3PNGHFLR1oJ21FBEcSw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ6GKoX5-Q5Vry=2HE-5mf6XYQgze40hyYO-prnVK%2Bzr6A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: > There are already two "native" ways to do this: > make config-recursive > use a ports management tool like portmaster/portupgrade portmaster certainly does not do this, nor make config-recursive(although it faster than the portmaster dialog). As I already mentioned, portupgrade used to give them to you all at once, no interruptions between IIRC. As it stands right now, 'portmaster x11/kde4' on a clean install pretty much guarantees you'll be console baby sitting for 1/2 hr or more unless you use the accept defaults option. To put it another, I think the default make behavior should be more akin 'make config-recursive' rather than take each OPTION as it comes. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK0CnHQmXvgPRKe_k1Bx_SRmA9xm=tD7Ms4ociPbE16Q5A>