Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:28:57 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Ermal Lu?i <eri@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r251993 - in projects/pf/head/sys: net netpfil/pf Message-ID: <20130621072857.GU1214@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAPBZQG22cX3FMcdZGXP81sqQGehyptYCBwmGfpFyVvcTe9L2bg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201306191337.r5JDbU3c028003@svn.freebsd.org> <CAPBZQG3p5MtjJPcQv28GdfGZBLL7kXCnaX=H1D3ZNQEXYQUUWg@mail.gmail.com> <20130621065232.GT1214@FreeBSD.org> <CAPBZQG22cX3FMcdZGXP81sqQGehyptYCBwmGfpFyVvcTe9L2bg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:55:16AM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote: E> Before the implementation of the multi-locks. E> You were able to specify limits and tuning at runtime. Before implementation of multi-locks there were no hash sizes neither hash masks. > Log: > De-vnet hash sizes and hash masks. > > Submitted by: Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass gmx.com> > Reviewed by: trociny -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130621072857.GU1214>