Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 13:23:12 -0800 From: "Jayachandran C." <jchandra@freebsd.org> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ThunderX2 support in FreeBSD/arm64 Message-ID: <CA%2B7sy7DNmkRkcpxA2kpJCNBF0D4gCemgj3A4Trx055-0jOGh%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2Ad2P0cuzvLVv-ndTTuq-EJuT7JUioJJEPhJ7BD8CD5xA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2B7sy7BWtSi5uDgusf-sEHd06EGXwnUxo9cr8A9gLh1L_YJoXw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyFy2DXHvAudezY9TUjnADO4FAbeKthxGyEOvow89iXmXa9ig@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyFy2Ad2P0cuzvLVv-ndTTuq-EJuT7JUioJJEPhJ7BD8CD5xA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 12:02 PM Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 14:08, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > I see that D10082, D10083, D10084 are still open, awaiting review. > > Oops, that should be D18002, D18003, D18004. ThunderX2 should should boot even without these changes, the default association between PCI RC and GIC ITS based on NUMA settings should work fine. It would be good to get these reviewed since it adds support for the ARM specific IORT table, which is standard way of passing the associations between RC and ITS - and is required for full ACPI support. Thanks, JC
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2B7sy7DNmkRkcpxA2kpJCNBF0D4gCemgj3A4Trx055-0jOGh%2Bg>