Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 02:30:29 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Blackman <mark@exonetric.com> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound Message-ID: <503203B5.1080300@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CDC9FFBF-9BD8-4633-AE2C-688DD6690DC7@exonetric.com> References: <CAL409Kzjjaur5%2B1gGh7VtTdg5M1zjLpZ-kmm8%2BrWv%2Bw9ua%2B14A@mail.gmail.com> <5031FAAB.9020409@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208200852420.78446@ai.fobar.qr> <5031FF67.80000@FreeBSD.org> <CDC9FFBF-9BD8-4633-AE2C-688DD6690DC7@exonetric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/20/2012 02:16, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
> On 20 Aug 2012, at 10:12, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
>> On 08/20/2012 01:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>
>>> We will continue to reject this until there are more firm plans,
>>> proper documentation on the security support side, which I cannot
>>> remember Simon got an answer for.
>>
>> I gave a clear answer. If there are any pieces missing it's up to Simon
>> to follow up with Dag-Erling.
>
>
>>> I continue to say that I am not willing to trade one for another
>>> for the sake of just changing the name.
>>
>> Have you seriously not been paying attention to the numerous reasons why
>> BIND in the base is no longer a good fit?
>
> Perhaps bunging together a quick wiki-page to point busier individuals
> at would be handy?
Just read this thread in the archives, that should do it for you.
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
I can do.
-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?503203B5.1080300>