Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 11:27:57 -0700 From: Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS Message-ID: <CAETOPp0WgHaWeibOcX_D5=LG4gKqFEmdgnFkA9HEtyhLF%2BTbsg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <D094B054-D5BE-482A-8DDF-E4728934E892@orthanc.ca> References: <554BB84F.7060605@FreeBSD.org> <554BCD4C.8090500@FreeBSD.org> <CAGHfRMAc4XwqME8Nmi05oy1HBWZZTGLsWoXwkQw3W542GCZB1g@mail.gmail.com> <3137063.YOSa6Au8Xi@ralph.baldwin.cx> <554D1DD5.5080106@FreeBSD.org> <CACYV=-F5RUVNmhqX13=EndiZhKPMSgp93QjWVJx2QZn1zMbTyA@mail.gmail.com> <554E2221.1040105@FreeBSD.org> <D094B054-D5BE-482A-8DDF-E4728934E892@orthanc.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maybe off-topic, but functionality-wise it might make much more sense to import Fossil. RCS has too many limitations this day and age when better tools are available. Of course, this would require people to learn something new, which I know can be a challenge. Jos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAETOPp0WgHaWeibOcX_D5=LG4gKqFEmdgnFkA9HEtyhLF%2BTbsg>