Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:45:06 +0100 From: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? Message-ID: <54B40822.9000702@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <D5E3B7024DE7A949DDF12468@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> <F8F2C00190BADAE1AA7CFEF8@atuin.in.mat.cc> <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net> <D5E3B7024DE7A949DDF12468@ogg.in.absolight.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12.01.2015 18:08, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > +--On 12 janvier 2015 17:59:36 +0100 Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> wrote: > | > | But it would be nice to have a poudriere option to avoid rebuilds of > | ports without version bumps. If something should go horribly wrong every > | now and then, you can still fall back to the default rebuild behavior. > | > | I think it should be possibly provided that port versions are bumped > | correctly. But maybe I'm wrong. > > Like someone else said, you can use bulk -S, but don't complain if you end > up with something that's horribly broken :-) bulk -S didn't really work well for me (see original post). But I think I my original question is answered by now: There's no supported way of avoiding excessive rebuilds with poudriere. What I'm now doing is: * Dry run of poudriere bulk with normal list of ports * make a list of ports that will be rebuilt because of new version * Run poudriere bulk with new list There are still some ports without version bump rebuilt, but it's a much smaller number. Especially libreoffice/KDE, etc. rebuilds are avoided. This procedure probably has some issues. But in case of problems I'll just do a normal incremental build.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54B40822.9000702>