Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:33:51 +0300
From:      Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl>
To:        David Cross <dcrosstech@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Review D38047 ... and then there was one....
Message-ID:  <a9b5e3e7-904f-46be-ab0e-068c6e6fef0a@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl>
In-Reply-To: <DB1FFEBD-1FD4-43A5-9899-85C6DD292E3E@gmail.com>
References:  <1fd47603-0bf2-4fcf-a556-22335d99e203@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> <DB1FFEBD-1FD4-43A5-9899-85C6DD292E3E@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------D1rFfEvTaTiecJtZmNdQ5XEB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

W dniu 7.10.2024 o 07:05, David Cross pisze:

> How many entries are in your ldap structure?  I can attempt a replication here

Hello David,

I will rather not expose it publicly. Whole LDAP directory contains few 
thousand entries - and it was was used for the tests mentioned in this 
thread.

With the filters applied I see below 1k entries, and then lookup with 
nsdc running takes: first lookup 0.16s, next lookups 0.09s, while 
without nscd it varies from 0.12 to 0.08 - so nscd performs OK.

I have your patch applied and I am still testing it with 
net/nss-pam-ldapd from ports with patch for login classes applied (it's 
present in port but not enabled by default). So far it works without issues.

-- 
Marek Zarychta

--------------D1rFfEvTaTiecJtZmNdQ5XEB
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>W dniu 7.10.2024 o 07:05, David Cross pisze: </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:DB1FFEBD-1FD4-43A5-9899-85C6DD292E3E@gmail.com">
      <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">How many entries are in your ldap structure?  I can attempt a replication here</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Hello David, <br>
    </p>
    <p>I will rather not expose it publicly. Whole LDAP directory
      contains few thousand entries - and it was was used for the tests
      mentioned in this thread.</p>
    <p>With the filters applied I see below 1k entries, and then lookup
      with nsdc running takes: first lookup 0.16s, next lookups 0.09s,
      while without nscd it varies from 0.12 to 0.08 - so nscd performs
      OK. <br>
    </p>
    <p>I have your patch applied and I am still testing it with
      net/nss-pam-ldapd from ports with patch for login classes applied
      (it's present in port but not enabled by default). So far it works
      without issues.<br>
    </p>
    <p><span style="white-space: pre-wrap">
</span></p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Marek Zarychta</pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------D1rFfEvTaTiecJtZmNdQ5XEB--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a9b5e3e7-904f-46be-ab0e-068c6e6fef0a>