Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:49:40 -0500 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> To: "Kirk Davis" <kirk.davis@epsb.ca> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb) Message-ID: <200801212049.41382@aldan> In-Reply-To: <DB9A31C316524A4A83E54A2C0D2065570972D21A@Exchange24.EDU.epsb.ca> References: <200801090114.56195@aldan> <200801201706.30461@Misha> <DB9A31C316524A4A83E54A2C0D2065570972D21A@Exchange24.EDU.epsb.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On =EF=EE=ED=E5=E4=B3=EB=EE=EA 21 =F1=B3=F7=E5=ED=FC 2008, Kirk Davis wrote: =3D I don't think it is a conscious effort on anyone's part to make it =3D different, it is just a port of an older Linux version that does not yet =3D have all the newer features. Of course not. All I'm urging is a conscious effort to keep it the same... =3D The Linux way is not always the best way IMHO. =A0A lot of the features= and =3D libraries in Linux have grown out of necessity rather that good plannin= g. Agreed. But Linux is the de-facto standard. If someone like Research in Mot= ion=20 (makers of BlackBerry) or Nokia decides to release a Linux-version of the=20 software for their devices, FreeBSD better run it -- even if=20 our /alternative/ methods of talking to the same devices is better... -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200801212049.41382>