Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:14:34 +0100 From: Georgios Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com> To: Robert Sevat <robert.sevat@live.nl> Cc: "freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>, "andre@freebsd.org" <andre@freebsd.org>, "bug-followup@freebsd.org" <bug-followup@freebsd.org>, =?KOI8-U?B?4czFy9PBzsTSIPfPzM/C1cXX?= <a.v.volobuev@gmail.com>, Nicolas DEFFAYET <nicolas@deffayet.com>, "melifaro@freebsd.org" <melifaro@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: kern/185876: ipfw not matching incoming packets decapsulating ipsec. example l2tp/ipsec Message-ID: <CACvFP_ju7b8RybRjg4seWpWa_GL6wcpiN6c55f=ja-4-tA5Bgw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <DUB114-W84859A5D84219FDD583B1387770@phx.gbl> References: <CACvFP_g4L=pK3ZmZ_kSq=OO%2BaZANA9k--n7Uhi1Tp6ULO0JHdw@mail.gmail.com> <CACvFP_hUOjNJ69MH7Lj5thvPjCtA_81%2Bj-YbJMFqk6VfQbg2LQ@mail.gmail.com> <1393369044.21345.1.camel@fr-wks3.corp.novso.com> <1393627004.8727.3.camel@fr-wks3.corp.novso.com> <DUB114-W84859A5D84219FDD583B1387770@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Glebius is working on a patch. I hope it will be commited soon to stable. On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Robert Sevat <robert.sevat@live.nl> wrote: > Hey, > > First off all, thanks for the patch, should we wait for FreeBSD 10.1, use > 10.0/stable or patch it our selves? > > Or is this going to be issued as Errata patch for FreeBSD 10.0-Release? > (which I think it should be) > > Kind Regards, > Robert Sevat > > > > Subject: Re: kern/185876: ipfw not matching incoming packets > decapsulating ipsec. example l2tp/ipsec > > From: nicolas@deffayet.com > > To: gamanakis@gmail.com > > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:36:44 +0100 > > CC: andre@freebsd.org; melifaro@freebsd.org; a.v.volobuev@gmail.com; > freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org; bug-followup@freebsd.org > > > > > The following patch seem to be the only working workaround for IPsec > > transport mode and tunnel mode. Please note the use of M_PROTO7 instead > > of M_PROTO5 as that is not used in netinet & netinet6. M_PROTO5 is used > > for another purpose and so using it may create a conflict like M_PROTO3. > > > > --- > > Index: netinet/ip_var.h > > =================================================================== > > --- netinet/ip_var.h (revision 262470) > > +++ netinet/ip_var.h (working copy) > > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ > > */ > > #define M_FASTFWD_OURS M_PROTO1 /* changed dst to > > local */ > > #define M_IP_NEXTHOP M_PROTO2 /* explicit ip > > nexthop */ > > -#define M_SKIP_FIREWALL M_PROTO3 /* skip firewall > > processing, > > +#define M_SKIP_FIREWALL M_PROTO7 /* skip firewall > > processing, > > keep in sync with IP6 > > */ > > #define M_IP_FRAG M_PROTO4 /* fragment > > reassembly */ > > > > Index: netinet6/ip6_var.h > > =================================================================== > > --- netinet6/ip6_var.h (revision 262470) > > +++ netinet6/ip6_var.h (working copy) > > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ > > * IPv6 protocol layer specific mbuf flags. > > */ > > #define M_IP6_NEXTHOP M_PROTO2 /* explicit ip > > nexthop */ > > -#define M_SKIP_FIREWALL M_PROTO3 /* skip firewall > > processing, > > +#define M_SKIP_FIREWALL M_PROTO7 /* skip firewall > > processing, > > keep in sync with > > IPv4 */ > > > > #ifdef __NO_STRICT_ALIGNMENT > > --- > > > > > > -- > > Nicolas DEFFAYET > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACvFP_ju7b8RybRjg4seWpWa_GL6wcpiN6c55f=ja-4-tA5Bgw>