Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 20:47:17 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Jason Lixfeld <jason+lists.freebsd-questions@lixfeld.ca> Cc: Ansar Mohammed <ansarm@gmail.com>, 'Atom Powers' <atom.powers@gmail.com>, 'FreeBSD Questions Mailing List' <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Trouble with nss|pam|openldap Message-ID: <20060525014717.GG57363@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <E01591C1-8037-4701-8B62-01CB7DE8FFE6@lixfeld.ca> References: <003501c67f7f$95f0fad0$0405a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> <E01591C1-8037-4701-8B62-01CB7DE8FFE6@lixfeld.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (May 24), Jason Lixfeld said: > On 24-May-06, at 6:15 PM, Ansar Mohammed wrote: > > >Have you tried nss_ldap without pam? > > How is that even possible? It's possible, but not too useful. If you always force people to ssh in via keys, for example, you don't need pam_ldap. PAM only job is authentication, NSS handles everything after that. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060525014717.GG57363>