Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:55:41 -0400 (EDT)
From:      spork <spork@super-g.com>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        John Capo <jc@irbs.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 2.2.X ping -l == ping -f 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.970430135458.20112A-100000@super-g.inch.com>
In-Reply-To: <E0wMQMI-0002YJ-00@rover.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner,

Sorry, sorry, sorry, I thought the machine I was on was up-to-date, but it
wasn't...  My bad.

Charles

On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Warner Losh wrote:

> In message <Pine.BSF.3.95.970429215140.16981A-100000@super-g.inch.com> spork writes:
> : I do like the side-effect this produces; namely, joe user can't do a
> : "pseudo ping-flood" by setting a huge preload.
> 
> That was the intended effect.
> 
> : 2.1.7.1 allows a big preload value, which I didn't care for...
> 
> Yuck.  I thought I had back ported it.  Are you asking for this to be
> placed into the 2.1 stable branch?
> 
> Warner
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970430135458.20112A-100000>