Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:51:32 +1100
From:      Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
To:        Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sbrk(2) broken
Message-ID:  <20080104095132.GC947@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1JAg1t-0000Yt-0f@clue.co.za>
References:  <20080104002002.L30578@fledge.watson.org> <E1JAg1t-0000Yt-0f@clue.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--GV0iVqYguTV4Q9ER
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 08:27:41AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>I have long lived processes that continuously handle very valuable
>data and potentially get very large (several GB).  I'd like that
>process to be able to make a rational decision about what happens to its
>memory contents when an allocation fails rather than having the
>proverbial rug pulled out from under it.  Rug pulling at any point=20
>can cost an annual salary or two.

If you google for freebsd+sigdanger, you will find that this topic
was first discussed nearly 10 years ago.  Unfortunately, no progress
appears to have been made, though it crops up every few years.

--=20
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.

--GV0iVqYguTV4Q9ER
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHfgGk/opHv/APuIcRAq5uAKCRVg6oSCk3pAtapDSsyL437xaQnwCfZrH3
wtY4Xm0mGdNFTsBVK/OzQsY=
=hte+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GV0iVqYguTV4Q9ER--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080104095132.GC947>