Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:24:05 -0700 From: YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: Andrey Smagin <samspeed@mail.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AX88772A AX88772B chipset differences? Message-ID: <20110720202405.GB11521@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <E1QjcjO-0000Ow-00.samspeed-mail-ru@f43.mail.ru> References: <E1QcEjo-0005Zh-00.samspeed-mail-ru@f287.mail.ru> <20110630171914.GA12124@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20110713000541.GC7564@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <E1QjcjO-0000Ow-00.samspeed-mail-ru@f43.mail.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:46:54PM +0400, Andrey Smagin wrote: > > 13 июля 2011, 04:07 от YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com>: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:19:14AM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:44:48PM +0400, Andrey Smagin wrote: > > > > I have card based on AX88772B. I tried patch axe driver for vendor and > > device IDs. card detected, set up link, but no data received. What else need > > for patch in this driver ? Anybody have datasheet ? > > > > > > ASIX requires a login account to get the data sheet so it's not > > > publicly available to open source developers. > > > AFAIK the difference between AX88772A and AX88772B is IPv4/IPv6 > > > checksum offloading support of AX88772B. The introduction of > > > checksum offloading means they might have changed its RX header > > > format which in turn makes current RX handler to not work. The > > > other difference would be more advanced power saving used in > > > AX8877B but it wouldn't be much difference to axe(4) driver once > > > PHY is correctly woken in initialization phase. > > > Could you show me your diff and verbose boot output to know PHY > > > model and EEPROM data? > > > > I have a minimal patch for AX88772B. It requires more work to > > support TX/RX checksum offloading, flow-control and power saving > > but attached patch would be enough for most cases. > > Let me know whether it works or not. > > Great thanx !!! It work but I not tested under heavy load. Only ping and some Mbytes via nfs. > Thanks for testing. The patch was already committed to HEAD(r224020). I'm implementing TX/RX checksum offloading and flow-control and that feature would be available in near future. Thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110720202405.GB11521>