Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Jul 2018 13:47:20 +0300
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk>
Cc:        avg@freebsd.org, eric@vangyzen.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd@hda3.com, truckman@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Ryzen issues on FreeBSD ? (with sort of workaround)
Message-ID:  <20180705104720.GE5562@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <E1fb1jV-0000yT-B2@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>
References:  <20180705103135.GD5562@kib.kiev.ua> <E1fb1jV-0000yT-B2@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> > It does not make any sense to even try to access the chicken bits
> > MSRs when running under virtualization.  It is the duty of the
> > hypervisor to configure hardware. 
> 
> I would tend to agree with you :-) I was kind of surprised to read that they
> are actually saved and restored as part of a VM context switch in fact.
Why do you state that they are saved/restored ?  What is the evidence ?

> 
> > I updated the patch.
> 
> Thanks I shall try this now on my workstation and the Epyc virtual machine

On VM the patch should be NOP, testing it is a waste of time IMO.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180705104720.GE5562>