Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 19:32:41 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> To: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'Wiring down' iSCSI devices / stop swapping dev nodes... Message-ID: <88E7AF042B7C82964163CEAF@study64.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <E526E36E-DCBB-48EE-B574-447469D5AB17@cs.huji.ac.il> References: <963D4F6D5D95769A2C8A07D1@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <E526E36E-DCBB-48EE-B574-447469D5AB17@cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On 8 May 2014 17:12:24 +0300 Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote: > one solution is to use gpart (8) > gpart create -s GPT /dev/dan > =E2=80=A6 > gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -l d0/p1 /dev/dan > > and you can use now > /dev/gpt/d0/p1 > > which [should] be true whatever iscsi decides to call device. I hadn't thought of that - mostly because the devices underlying the iSCSI=20 are already gparted (i.e. the iSCSI target is a GPT partition on an=20 underlying disk). I'm just trying it now - looks like it will work (Ok, it's created - I need = to test failure etc.) Is there any performance hit from having 'GPT within a GPT' kind of thing=20 going on? - I suppose I could just share out the raw disk (i.e. /dev/daX)=20 via iSCSI and then there'd be only one layer of partitioning going on...=20 I'm not sure if that's a good idea or not :) -Karl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?88E7AF042B7C82964163CEAF>