Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 06:49:37 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dev/etherswitch Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=qkA%2B%2B6=rbCEU6ydGTO9OcQMYU8hfj93popthH4pO6Aw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <E627B127-B74F-446C-995D-4524B14D02BA@lassitu.de> References: <C456CF98-0E0D-4563-8FDB-B77B8CF5B9E1@lassitu.de> <CAJ-VmomL=v00uEN62V8NSFEoD9LcUg1KVW38HrXxT-gXnZoO4g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonwDFJzReS%2BRE6umGK8XoFwPOt=FGFAyOhYtOvjzM7sCQ@mail.gmail.com> <091CDDB2-AF5D-4BD7-8AC2-EC0CC5A78E40@lassitu.de> <CAJ-VmonPTL9pwqk2O9brmz%2B66U8WCv2n0etZ1ncaCfUC6Z1z-g@mail.gmail.com> <E627B127-B74F-446C-995D-4524B14D02BA@lassitu.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4 January 2012 06:45, Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> wrote: > Long term we'll want to revisit the gpio infrastructure to be able to mak= e use of i.e. polarity of the pins etc., and a more sophisticated way to co= nfigure these functions through hints. =A0I'd like to avoid adding another = three or four bitmasks... Well long term I think we shouldn't be using bitmasks, but should configure each GPIO pin along with default values. But that can come later. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=qkA%2B%2B6=rbCEU6ydGTO9OcQMYU8hfj93popthH4pO6Aw>