Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:25:48 +0200 From: Tilman Linneweh <tilman+2004-04-08@arved.at> To: Jason Lixfeld <jason+lists.freebsd@lixfeld.ca> Cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Anyone using AMD64 + FreeBSD + openldap? (was: openldap-2.1.27 - Message-ID: <20040409102548.GW64506@arved.at> In-Reply-To: <E9C69392-89DD-11D8-B3A5-000A95989E4A@lixfeld.ca> References: <1136DB62-8983-11D8-9A25-000A95989E4A@lixfeld.ca> <20040408210939.GA79932@arved.at> <E9C69392-89DD-11D8-B3A5-000A95989E4A@lixfeld.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jason Lixfeld [2004-04-09 06:25]: > On Apr 8, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > > >* Jason Lixfeld [Do, 08 Apr 2004 at 19:35 GMT]: > >>>I use OpenLDAP 2.2/back-bdb/bdb 4.2.52+patches on RELENG_4. > >>>I don't see such problems. I just now starting to toy with > >>>RELENG_5_2. > >> > >>What hardware are you using? I can't run BDB because of AMD64 issues > >>with fast mutexes so I'm using ldbm instead. > >> > >>>I also note that I haven't had any problems using db_recover > >>>to recover from hard crashes. > >> > >>Again, this would be fine if I could run BDB. > > > >Matthias Andree suggested, a possible workaround to the problems with > >the fast mutexes may be to add --with-mutex=x86/gcc-assembly to the > >CONFIGURE_ARGS. > > I'm using ports, so I added that to the Makefile in two locations. I > also noted that the configure script didn't seem to have an option for > --with-mutex when I ran ./configure --help. Modified Makefile is > below. > Sorry for being unclear. Not to the openldap port, but the BDB port you are running (e.g. db41). regards tilman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040409102548.GW64506>