Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 19:02:57 +0000 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com> To: Rafal Lukawiecki <raf@rafal.net>, "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: "freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org" <freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE ZFS AMIs Now Available Message-ID: <01000168f7b0abdc-d4330dff-8fc3-4545-9609-ea10198e81b5-000000@email.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <EC5F2406-C31B-4A29-A5EF-EFD5F2DABA47@rafal.net> References: <01000168f5cad864-47f026f0-37b6-479a-bfb0-c46ec189c929-000000@email.amazonses.com> <CACM2dAbQXj2Mt%2BRhCNZRH-bZcYbmqsNu-EmkeKUe7kiHPmcvUQ@mail.gmail.com> <EC5F2406-C31B-4A29-A5EF-EFD5F2DABA47@rafal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/16/19 10:49 AM, Rafal Lukawiecki wrote: > Are there any disk performance benefits when using ZFS vs UFS in the AWS EBS set-up? I haven't run any tests. I'd assume that it's the same as the ZFS/UFS difference outside of EC2... but feel free to run some benchmarks and report back! -- Colin Percival Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01000168f7b0abdc-d4330dff-8fc3-4545-9609-ea10198e81b5-000000>