Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 23:43:28 +0300 From: Michael Zhilin <mizhka@gmail.com> To: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@bluezbox.com> Cc: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC test request Message-ID: <CAF19XB%2BUZb8cOvPyjqcQowmamjGeSeSj6gXuCX%2BkpxEgJoC-wQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <F86B4D0D-7A63-419A-AE2C-5ACD5F2052E9@bluezbox.com> References: <20161027172820.GA44678@bluezbox.com> <5813143B.3080308@grosbein.net> <57c4bb4f-1bba-5620-9a88-46364830c0d0@freebsd.org> <CAF19XBL6nNMQF3A9ACbJHD=zMNhrKH4QGJ827we6ngJjv0P54A@mail.gmail.com> <F86B4D0D-7A63-419A-AE2C-5ACD5F2052E9@bluezbox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
NP. Yes, there is no panic. Also checked what tested kernels use INTRNG ;) Thanks! On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@bluezbox.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Michael Zhilin <mizhka@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Oleksandr, > > > > BroadCom 4716 looks fine before and after patch. I didn't check all > functionalities, because most of them are in 12-current only. > > Thanks a lot, Michael! Really appreciated. > > Original regression was panic, so if it doesn=E2=80=99t panic - then both= fixes > combined do not introduce regression > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF19XB%2BUZb8cOvPyjqcQowmamjGeSeSj6gXuCX%2BkpxEgJoC-wQ>