Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 06:37:21 +0900 From: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> To: Moin Rahman <bofh@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We need to do something about build times Message-ID: <SI2PR01MB5036D44C558EA37006B9A626FADCA@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> In-Reply-To: <FC481D90-D750-4BA5-B030-F0F47B09F6E3@freebsd.org> References: <ZTgXDSmpAq6lpT3f@fuz.su> <B98EE86E-6FF4-4C24-8524-5AB7789E2235@freebsd.org> <SI2PR01MB5036F546374E1488429CE6DEFADCA@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <FC481D90-D750-4BA5-B030-F0F47B09F6E3@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Moin Rahman wrote on 2023/10/28 01:50: > But by no means it reduces the build > time of texlive-texmf. Hope everyone enjoys that. :) > There are updates in the current port tree that cause packages rebuilt by glib updates to be rebuilt again :) > [00:01:19] [Dry Run] Deleting texlive-base-20230313_3.pkg: new dependency: print/ghostscript10 > [00:01:22] [Dry Run] Deleting texlive-texmf-20230313.pkg: missing dependency: texlive-base-20230313_3 > [00:01:39] [Dry Run] Ports to build: ... print/texlive-base print/texlive-texmf ... As far as I can see, it seems that it is possible to avoid rebuilding texlive-texmf by manually running poudriere bulk with print/texlive-base. However, something else may cause texlive-texmf package to be removed, so it would be better to proceed gradually from libXdmcp, libxcb or something. I enjoy manual manipulation to minimize the time spent on rebuilding :) Regards.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SI2PR01MB5036D44C558EA37006B9A626FADCA>