Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:19:21 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bootstrapping from stable/9 to head? Message-ID: <CANCZdfoS4c8=633Mh9RmkBaEzdxFfL8dHtMLR253Z0O=U4xe7g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <FEF5756F-D228-4B43-8E1F-2085483115BC@gmail.com> References: <FEF5756F-D228-4B43-8E1F-2085483115BC@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Make build world first! On Dec 23, 2015 5:06 PM, "NGie Cooper" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ian and Warner, > I realize this isn=E2=80=99t a path that=E2=80=99s currently supp= orted, but when I > was running a test for jhb on stable/9 (ref9-amd64.freebsd.org to be > exact), I ran into this error: > > bmake[1]: "/scratch/tmp/ngie/svn/Makefile" line 466: "Target architecture > for arm/conf/A20 unknown. config(8) likely too old." > *** [universe_arm_kernels] Error code 1 > > bmake: stopped in /scratch/tmp/ngie/svn > > I was wondering if there was a way where someone could more > reliably bootstrap from stable/9 to stable/10, or if the directions just > need to be changed to =E2=80=9Cupgrade to the latest release of 10, then = upgrade to > 11-CURRENT=E2=80=9D? > Also, config is a build tool in Makefile.inc1=E2=80=A6 I was wond= ering if > the check in Makefile is a bit too stringent / incorrect. > Thanks, > -NGie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfoS4c8=633Mh9RmkBaEzdxFfL8dHtMLR253Z0O=U4xe7g>