Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:25:38 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: barbara <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> Cc: gnome <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: x11-toolkits/py-gnome-extras: PKGNAMESUFFIX usage Message-ID: <1253485538.38842.175.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <KQ89W7$B808A08F2CDBEA8C6A3720558C189536@libero.it> References: <KQ89W7$B808A08F2CDBEA8C6A3720558C189536@libero.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-P62D626cpEfA52VQCr7y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 19:00 +0200, barbara wrote: > For curiosity, can someone comment/explain me about the usage of PKGNAMES= UFFIX in x11-toolkits/py-gnome-extras? > My curiosity is originated by a problem I noticed with a "non-gnome" port= . Refer to the following two messages I've posted in the freebsd-ports mail= ing list: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-September/057098.ht= ml > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-September/057103.ht= ml I think this comes from an archaic limitation that port names should not contain '-'. It could probably be merged into the PORTNAME now. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-P62D626cpEfA52VQCr7y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkq2q+EACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4f8mgCfQnN4SQCh2+hkANFul06faJOH t0gAoKsawcRqD3BRcmwKn6H2eKQszNCG =hSQ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-P62D626cpEfA52VQCr7y--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1253485538.38842.175.camel>