Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 14:25:39 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bug in setsockopt()... ? Message-ID: <199701142125.OAA01596@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970114202215.roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Jan 14, 97 08:22:15 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> According to Terry Lambert: > > some time ago). I believe that it *does not* include interaction > > of a mmap'ed object with the file I/O subsystem; currently, the only > > test that shows the INN failure to use msync() appropriately is INN > > itself. 8-(. > > It is fixed in INN 1.5.* where msync() can be configured in config.data. Yes; the point, though, wwas to demonstrate the failure case from improper use in the validation suite to flesh out the meaning of "implementation defined". This would result (ideally) in a man page "NOTES" section entry describing implementation specific behaviour for each of the implementations validated... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701142125.OAA01596>