Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Dec 2001 16:49:34 +0100
From:      "Leif Neland" <leifn@neland.dk>
To:        "Patrick O'Reilly" <patrick@mip.co.za>, "Chris Fedde" <chris@fedde.littleton.co.us>
Cc:        <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Load balancing stuff (mainly samba) 
Message-ID:  <00b701c17a7f$ca784740$6d05a8c0@neland.dk>
References:  <NDBBIMKICMDGDMNOOCAICEFMEAAA.patrick@mip.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick O'Reilly" <patrick@mip.co.za>
To: "Chris Fedde" <chris@fedde.littleton.co.us>
Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:20 AM
Subject: RE: Load balancing stuff (mainly samba)


> > Take a look at coda.  It uses a scheme of local cacheing and
> > replication to present a common file hierarchy over a potentialy
> > large number of servers.  IIRC samba can share a coda filesystem.
> >
>
> This looks interesting!
>
> I have been asked to set up a mail server with a hot backup which
could
> take over should the first server fail.  Does anyone have any
> "real-world" experience using coda for this type of problem?
>
> Does coda even fit this problem?  It is described as a replicated
> network file system.  That tells me that data would be kept safe by
> replication, but there may still be a single point of failure,
namely
> the mail server itself which is simply making use of the file
system.
>
> Any comments?
>
If you use two machines, and having mailservers (smtp and pop3) on
both, I think that would work. Either the same machine as hosting the
coda, or use two others for that.

You could write a script to change the ip of smtp and pop3 to point to
the active server using ddns.

Leif




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00b701c17a7f$ca784740$6d05a8c0>