Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:14:00 +0200 From: Mark Huizer <freebsd@dohd.org> To: Doug Poland <doug@polands.org> Cc: Mark Huizer <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Routing without ipfw? Message-ID: <20001010211400.B15021@dohd.cx> In-Reply-To: <NDBBKMNOJKJGAEKJNLIAGEHIELAA.doug@polands.org>; from doug@polands.org on Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 02:00:04PM -0500 References: <20001010191123.A15021@dohd.cx> <NDBBKMNOJKJGAEKJNLIAGEHIELAA.doug@polands.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > That's a different question. Yes, you need ipfw for natd. > > But ipfw is a loadable kernel module > > > > Mark > > So, logically, if you need natd for routing between interfaces, > and natd needs ipfw, then ipfw is required for routing. Either > compiled into the kernel or as a lkm? > You don't need natd for routing. You need natd for address translation. That's the difference in the question. And ipfw can be either kernel or lkm, but if I'm not mistaken you need a kernel anyway (for IP_DIVERT, see natd's manpage) Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001010211400.B15021>