Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 18:30:35 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: "Peter Brezny" <peter@skyrunner.net> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: traffic prioritization. Message-ID: <20021202183035.29e6c95e.Alexander@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <NEBBIGLHNDFEJMMIEGOOCEDMFEAA.peter@skyrunner.net> References: <20021201144939.0001f7d7.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <NEBBIGLHNDFEJMMIEGOOCEDMFEAA.peter@skyrunner.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:07:30 -0500
"Peter Brezny" <peter@skyrunner.net> wrote:
> Do you have an example of what you described below that I could look at to
> minimize syntax battles?
---snip---
############
# Flush out the list before we begin.
${fwcmd} -f flush
${fwcmd} -f queue flush
${fwcmd} -f pipe flush
${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 64kbit/s queue 10KByte
${fwcmd} queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 10 queue 10KByte
${fwcmd} queue 2 config pipe 1 weight 1 queue 10Kbyte
${fwcmd} add queue 1 tcp from ${inside_net}/${inside_mask} to any via ${interface} out
${fwcmd} add queue 2 udp from ${inside_net}/${inside_mask} to any via ${interface} out
---snip---
This adds a pipe with a limit of 8k. Both queues share this bandwith, but
one gets more than the other.
Then outgoing tcp traffic flows through queue 1 and udp traffic through
queue 2.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
I believe the technical term is "Oops!"
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021202183035.29e6c95e.Alexander>