Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:57:55 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> To: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Paul Armstrong <freebsd-ports@otoh.org> Subject: Re: Differences between ports build and poudriere Message-ID: <24DD5A14-41CE-4AD3-9CC3-78EA0CBF2E2E@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <PSAPR03MB56393C5E985999337E908C60FAAD9@PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <PSAPR03MB56393C5E985999337E908C60FAAD9@PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 15. Jun 2022, at 23:11, Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> wro= te: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFI write optimistically in reference to the ports I maintain, but i= t seems very difficult to port a build by Bazel. > Only port of games/anki exist that are built by Bazel, but there are a lot= of patches. >=20 > It looks like it would be better to do something about the http_archive an= d http_file in the WORKSPACE file. > However, if the WORKSPACE file recurses further from there, there appears t= o be nothing that can be done. > Well however I just saw Bazel yesterday :) >=20 I agree, I worked a couple of days on changing www/envoy to build using baze= l last year, but I never managed to stop it from fetching files in the build= phase. It was quite a nightmare, unfortunately I forgot most of what I lear= ned about it and all the hacks I tried to make it work - my takeaway was tha= t bazel isn=E2=80=99t meant to be used without being connected to the intern= et. Cheers Michael > Regards. >=20 > Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2022/06/13 19:47: >=20 >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24DD5A14-41CE-4AD3-9CC3-78EA0CBF2E2E>