Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Nov 1997 12:04:52 -0800 (PST)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
To:        Neil Ludban <n-ludban@onu.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 2.2.5 upgrade not replacing kernel
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.971124120202.12844F-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.96.971121110042.36094B-100000@austin.onu.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Neil Ludban wrote:

> Somebody posted a question a couple days ago wondering why the new
> kernel's boot message said it was still the old version.  After getting
> 2.2.5 installed and working on my SCSI drive, I decided to upgrade the
> 2.2.2 version on the old IDE drive.  Here's what it did:
> 
> # ls -l /IDE/kern*
> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1172726 Nov 21 09:40 /IDE/kernel
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1457189 Oct 21 10:33 /IDE/kernel.GENERIC
> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1173041 Oct 20 12:21 /IDE/kernel.TIG1
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel        0 Nov 21 09:51 /IDE/kernel.config
> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1173041 Oct  6 20:42 /IDE/kernel.old
> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1172726 Nov 21 09:12 /IDE/kernel.prev
> 
> kernel and kernel.prev are identical, kernel.GENERIC is 2.2.5.  The first
> time I booted with -c, and it was using the old hardware configuration.
> Let it finish booting, figured out it was the old kernel, then rebooted
> using kernel.GENERIC.

This is a known bug in sysinstall; it forgets to link the new /kernel.
kernel.GENERIC is the new one, just copy it over.

>   195  v0  D+     0:00.03 mount /dev/sd0a /mnt
>   196  v0  DV+    0:00.01 mount /dev/sd0a /mnt
> 
> After a minute or so, "ncr0: timeout ccb=50506000 (skip)" showed up on the
> console.  Having had enough errors for one day, I tried to reboot and got
> "init: Some processes would not die; ps axl advised", then "Syncing
> disks... done" (later found out it did not set the clean flag).

Looks like those mount procs hung.  Your SCSI disk wasn't happy?

> Last question -- is it possible to do an install or upgrade from a SCSI
> zip drive?  I was unable to find a way to mount it.

I forgot to try this when I swiped our spare Zip.  I think it should work
OK if the ZIP is either DOS-formatted or BSD-formatted.  In the DOS case
it should think it's a DOS hard disk and give you the option in DOS
install.  For the BSD case I think it should treat it as a UFS install.
In both cases you must have the cart in the drive at boot time.

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971124120202.12844F-100000>