Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 22:07:09 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Snob Art Genre <ben@narcissus.ml.org> Cc: Steven Wallace <swallace@ece.uci.edu>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Pentium Pro status Message-ID: <199611220607.WAA14743@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Nov 1996 12:54:07 PST." <Pine.BSF.3.91.961120125310.219C-100000@narcissus.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, PPRO + 440FX is incompatible with a few chipsets mostly because the 440fx is PCI 2.0 . For instance, a friend of mine had horrible crashes with a diamond stealth and his 440fx when he switch to a matrox millenium the problem went away. The matrox meteor is supposed to generate an illegal PCI signal which kills the PCI bus on PPRO with the 440fx chipset. Memory aperture for speeding up raw displays is now the responsibility of the OS and not the BIOS so to get maximum display bandwith the OS or X server needs to program the chipset to disable caching on a given memory display region. Amancio >From The Desk Of Snob Art Genre : > On Thu, 21 Nov 1996, Steven Wallace wrote: > > > > > I wanted some input regarding Pentium Pro machines. > > Has anyone had any problems with the hardware and/or using it with > > FreeBSD? > > > > Are there any problems with the PP chipset(is the latest Orion II or someth ing?) > > I remember hearing about PCI problems with the chipset. Someone > > told me they still have problems in orion II. Is this true? > > > > What motherboards for Pentium Pro are good and reliable? > > > > What about multiprocessor support? Does anyone have FreeBSD hacks to > > support multiple processors? How well is it working? > > > > Thank you, > > > > Steven Wallace > > I'm using a PPro-200 with the 440FX chipset, I don't remember its > nickname. I've had no problems with it at all. > > > > Ben > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611220607.WAA14743>