Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:35:17 -0500 (EST) From: Bradley Dunn <bradley@dunn.org> To: spork <spork@super-g.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: closed NFS network Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.3.95.970218203005.-500155B-100000@swoosh.dunn.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970217134341.10802A-100000@super-g.inch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Feb 1997, spork wrote: > I'm trying to patch together a small 100M ether network for NFS traffic > between our POP server and shell server (and in the future, additional > shell machines). NFS looked like a good way to tackle this, as we can > have the shell machine die, and PPP users can still do most everything but > shell; our shell accounts are strictly a value-add. Also, future shell > machines could go on the same network and access the same mail spool that > resides on the POP machine, and they could export /home out to the web > server as well. Look into IMAP. More info is at http://www.imap.org/ In the documents section the is a paper called "Message Access Paradigms and Protocols" that explains why IMAP is superior for mailbox access. pbd
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.WNT.3.95.970218203005.-500155B-100000>