Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 13:52:15 -0500 From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com> Cc: Thomas Arnold <tom@inna.net>, Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, Brian Tao <taob@risc.org>, "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>, FREEBSD-CHAT-L <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: RSA 56-bit key challenge Message-ID: <17370.857587935@orion.webspan.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Mar 1997 07:43:35 PST." <Pine.BSF.3.95.970305074224.2232C-100000@harlie.bfd.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Eric J. Schwertfeger" wrote in message ID <Pine.BSF.3.95.970305074224.2232C-100000@harlie.bfd.com>: > O.K., so the Orion isn't SDRAM, but it does have faster memory access than > Natoma. It's a while back, but there was a massive discussion about problems with the Orion, mainly PCI ones if I remember. Also, since wcarchive was upgraded from an Orion m/b to a Natoma one, most (if not all) of it's stability problems are gone. I'm sure if you search the freebsd-hardware mailing list archives you'll find problems in all their gory detail. Unless a recent revision has fixed these problems, I'd avoid the orion like the plague. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17370.857587935>