Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 10 May 1998 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Cc:        Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, mckusick@mckusick.com
Subject:   Re: Soft Updates
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980510170949.19529D-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980509170859.5333F-100000@current1.whistle.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 9 May 1998, Julian Elischer wrote:

> Kirk had some very good arguments but I forget what they were..
> 
> 
> On Sun, 10 May 1998, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> 
> > According to Julian Elischer:
> > > you need to use the -n option of tunefs on an unmounted filesystem
> > > it's not a mount option..
> > 
> > Why not BTW ? async/noasync are mount options so one could expect
> > softupdates to be the same. Is there an reason for the current scheme (not
> > that I mind but it would make switch it on/off easier, especially for /).

I think Terry had either a solution for this, and/or a good reason why
this isn't a mount option. And as always an opinion.

- alex

"Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern
technology.  Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980510170949.19529D-100000>