Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, mckusick@mckusick.com Subject: Re: Soft Updates Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980510170949.19529D-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980509170859.5333F-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 9 May 1998, Julian Elischer wrote: > Kirk had some very good arguments but I forget what they were.. > > > On Sun, 10 May 1998, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > > According to Julian Elischer: > > > you need to use the -n option of tunefs on an unmounted filesystem > > > it's not a mount option.. > > > > Why not BTW ? async/noasync are mount options so one could expect > > softupdates to be the same. Is there an reason for the current scheme (not > > that I mind but it would make switch it on/off easier, especially for /). I think Terry had either a solution for this, and/or a good reason why this isn't a mount option. And as always an opinion. - alex "Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern technology. Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980510170949.19529D-100000>