Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 16:14:24 -0800 (PST) From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: jfieber@indiana.edu Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new category for multilingual ports? Message-ID: <199703030014.QAA26636@baloon.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970302115603.18125D-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> (message from John Fieber on Sun, 2 Mar 1997 12:09:02 -0500 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* It strikes me a slightly odd that properly internationalized * software should needs its own category. After all, should all * software be properly internationalized? (okay, I'm dreaming a * bit...) You're quite right. I'd rather just slap them on top of the original ones. But then the problem becomes that we'll start falling behind in the ever so intense latest-version-of-the-day game. (Not that we haven't already, of course.) * How about an "arrogant-us-english-only-imperial-software" ports * category to put things in proper perspective? Maybe I can rename the old ones of the way (fvwm2-english anyone?) and put the international ports in their place. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703030014.QAA26636>