Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 01:28:21 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: /home/smp/sys/kern init_smp.c Message-ID: <199704191728.BAA00592@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 19 Apr 1997 18:04:20 %2B0100." <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970419180254.279A-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 1997, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> > Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > peter 97/04/19 08:35:16
> > >
> > > Modified: home/smp/sys/kern init_smp.c
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > Log:
> > > change #include <vm/lock.h> to <sys/lock.h> - solves lockmgr panic!
> > > update the idle proc create code to use the "new" style fork that doesn
't
> > > "return" from the fork() function call - it now boots!
> > > (I'm running smp_active=2 right now)
> >
> > OOPS! Slip of the fingers with a remote commit.. Sorry, this message went
> > to the wrong commit mailing list.. :-] (Background for those on
> > -committers, the smp kernel was put on hold while the lite2 stuff was being
> > sorted out in -current. It was resync'ed a few days ago, which broke it
> > somewhat.)
>
> I must be doing something wrong. I cvsup'ed, updated and built but I
> still get the lockmgr panic :-(. Are there any pending fixes that I don't
> have yet maybe?
Hmm.. No.. I have 4 other touched files, and they have #ifdef
WORK_IN_PROGRESS around the changes, this is not defined.
Did you rerun config and "make clean depend"?
I ran without APIC_IO and SMP_INVLTLB to start with, and am currently (in
X11) running with APIC_IO and SMP_INVLTLB.
peter@spinner[1:25am]~/smp/sys-107> uptime
1:25AM up 22 mins, 2 users, load averages: 0.31, 0.26, 0.18
peter@spinner[1:25am]~/smp/sys-108> uname -a
FreeBSD spinner.DIALix.COM 3.0-SMP FreeBSD 3.0-SMP #160: Sun Apr 20 00:05:32 WST 1997 peter@spinner.DIALix.COM:/home/peter/smp/sys/compile/SMP i386
The other possibility is the difference in kernel configs.. Oh, are you
running P5 or P6? There is a potential problem with tss descriptor caching
that might have come out in the P6 under SMP..
> --
> Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com
> Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 951 1891
Cheers,
-Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704191728.BAA00592>