Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 21:49:08 +0200 From: Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, costa@inner.cortx.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sd0 timed out while idle Message-ID: <19970707214908.44376@mi.uni-koeln.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970707114954.16348J-100000@misery.sdf.com>; from Tom Samplonius on Mon, Jul 07, 1997 at 11:57:22AM -0700 References: <199707071847.LAA18164@phaeton.artisoft.com> <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970707114954.16348J-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 7, Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> wrote: > Also, the ncr controllers are little finicky. They have a delay option > that I had to increase otherwise it wouldn't wait long enough for the > drives to spin up. But I only had this problem on cold boots (never on > warm), and only with the ncr controllers. The Adaptec controllers seem to > wait much longer by default. The "NCR controllers" ??? They don't exist ... :) In fact, there are several independently developed BIOS versions offered with the various brands of NCR chip, and even my (2.5 year old) ASUS SP3G lets you specify an additional power on delay ... The Tekram cards seem to wait significantly longer by default (at least my DC390F does), compared to the SDMS BIOS cards from Symbios and others. > Quatum drives are known to go on a holiday after some continuous use. > Grand Prix drives are particularly bad. In fact, I think the Atlas is the > only respectible Quantum drive. How about the quality of the Atlas II and the Viking ? I don't really understand, why they offer two 7200RPM drives, again. Reminds me of the Atlas/Grand Prix ... Regards, STefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970707214908.44376>