Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 16:13:00 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: tom@sdf.com (Tom Samplonius) Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, Al.Johnson@AJC.State.Net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What I consider and odd install Message-ID: <199707140643.QAA08765@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970713232838.16170D-100000@misery.sdf.com> from Tom Samplonius at "Jul 13, 97 11:33:06 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Samplonius stands accused of saying: > > Strange... booteasy was a rather new addition to FreeBSD (2.0, 2.05, or > something... well that is "somewhat new"). Adaptec 2940 has had the > "bios support for more than two drives" option for a long time. I recall using booteasy on a DOS/Xenix 2.1.1 system. 8) > Does os-bs really work in this case (ie. when booteasy doesn't)? OS-BS is generally much better. I has the downside that it has to be configured, unlike booteasy which autodetects. > Tom -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707140643.QAA08765>