Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 16:49:38 -0600 From: "Alejandro Ramirez" <ales@megared.net.mx> To: "Cliff Addy" <fbsdlist@federation.addy.com> Cc: <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Equivalent ipfw rules Message-ID: <006301bf2fbb$b29719a0$d2630a0a@megared.net.mx> References: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.991113073316.13851A-100000@federation.addy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
If you think you need it, see "man routed" & take a look at gated in
"/usr/ports/net/gated".
Have Fun...
Ales
----- Original Message -----
From: Cliff Addy <fbsdlist@federation.addy.com>
To: Alejandro Ramirez <ales@megared.net.mx>
Cc: <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 1999 6:34 AM
Subject: RE: Equivalent ipfw rules
> On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Alejandro Ramirez wrote:
>
> > This arent Firewalls rules, just how the interface its going to
behave
> > in the router.
> >
> > no ip redirects : This is to disable redirecting packets through the
same
> > interface on wich they where received.
> >
> > no ip directed-broadcast : This is to disable the translation of
directed
> > broadcasts to physical broadcasts in an specific interface.
> >
> > no ip proxy-arp : This is to disable the use of the "proxy-arp" feature
in
> > an specific interface.
>
> OK, then is there a way/need to config the FreeBSD box interfaces to
> behave the same way?
>
> Cliff
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?006301bf2fbb$b29719a0$d2630a0a>