Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 08:06:00 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: ac199@hwcn.org Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux vs. the rest of the world, poor OS comparison on web page Message-ID: <19971014080600.54765@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971013221922.248C-100000@ppp1643.on.sympatico.ca>; from Tim Vanderhoek on Mon, Oct 13, 1997 at 10:25:22PM -0400 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971013143025.23349D-100000@shell6.ba.best.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.971013221922.248C-100000@ppp1643.on.sympatico.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 13, 1997 at 10:25:22PM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > On Mon, 13 Oct 1997, jkb wrote: > > > Hmm, > > > > I wonder if we should cc: linuxrx@www.falconweb.com and tell them > > that FreeBSD does support "Multiple CPU's" and pthreads. And the part > > about "most used for low-end workstation": > > <joke>Lets have FreeBSD Inc. sue them for public misinformation</joke>. > > Actually, I kinda' enjoyed reading it. Amusing. :-) > > I wouldn't worry too much about potential misinformation. > Speaking for myself, I'm not usually influenced too much by > reviewers who don't even take the time to smooth-out the tortured > English in their articles... Not so amusing is, that this is a concrete misinformation. And there are enough people who believe in such figures. -- Andreas Klemm powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD'' andreas@klemm.gtn.com - http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html andreas@FreeBSD.ORG - http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/benches.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971014080600.54765>