Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 05:05:22 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: ac199@hwcn.org Cc: ache@nagual.pp.ru, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk patch for review Message-ID: <199801181305.FAA13165@baloon.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980116175437.204E-100000@localhost> (message from Tim Vanderhoek on Fri, 16 Jan 1998 18:08:57 -0500 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Tim Vanderhoek <ac199@hwcn.org> * > We can have different bsd.port.mk for -current and 2.2, but I'd like * > to avoid that. * * Even if the appropriate patch flag is merged into 2.2.5-stable, * you'll need to include a patch binary in _all_ future * 222upgrade-9#.##.## files. That is an even bigger problem than incompatible bsd.port.mk. I can't make users' systems incompatible with the releases they are upgrading from. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801181305.FAA13165>