Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 08:14:49 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG, perhaps@yes.no, peter@netplex.com.au Subject: Ports system possible fixups list (PLEASE READ) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980120080459.257A-100000@ache.relcom.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980119090210.16547A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At this moment I see following variants to compensate patch returning to FreeBSD 2.1.0R behaviour (besides nonsense back out suggested by many). 1) Build separate /usr/bin/broken_patch especially for ports system (with one-line change in bsd.port.mk) 2) Scan all Index: patches in ports tree to replace ---/*** lines with correct ones. I find following ports which use Index: lines kinput2-canna+sj3+wnn, kinput2-canna+wnn, kinput2-sj3+wnn, kinput2-wnn, modula-3-lib, modula-3-socks, virtualpager, tkdesk, rtptools, rdist6, sup Really not so many! I not check yet how many from them have bogus ---/*** lines. 3) Make sed filter to detect patches with broken Index: and convert them on the fly. Anything else? -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980120080459.257A-100000>