Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 10:17:35 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <aklemm@hightek.com> To: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net>, Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/qt133 Makefile ports/x11/qt133/files md5 ports/x11/qt133/pkg PLIST Message-ID: <19980430101735.08525@hightek.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980429182334.414A-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>; from Alex on Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 06:24:23PM -0700 References: <199804282014.NAA18378@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980429182334.414A-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 06:24:23PM -0700, Alex wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > andreas 1998/04/28 13:14:23 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > x11/qt133 Makefile > > x11/qt133/files md5 > > x11/qt133/pkg PLIST > > Log: > > upgrade to latest libqt version 1.33 (after repository copy) > > Why isn't this just an upgrade for the qt port? AFAIK, Qt 1.33 is binary > and source compatible with 1.31. At least it seemed this way to me... It was Satoshi's wish, since we made the experience in the past, that sometimes things break. And with a growing ports collection you can't always test all packages that rely on something. So it's better to have some versions in parallel, than to break tings with one commit ! Ok, I also read the QT developers note about compatibility, but in fact, who knows ... -- B&K Gruppe - Wuppertal <aklemm@hightek.com> phone +49 202 7399 - 170 <andreas@FreeBSD.ORG> fax +49 202 7399 - 100 http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980430101735.08525>