Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 06:53:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de> To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu Cc: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can this be done with natd in -STABLE? Message-ID: <199805120453.GAA10057@internal> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980511145656.1378F-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> from Doug White at "May 11, 98 02:57:42 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, 11 May 1998, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have 4 isolated Class-C nets which communicate through one router > > running -STABLE. IPFIREWALL is enabled with IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT > > and without additional rules (I just restrict routing for debugging). > > > > I would like to change a connection request made to host1:port1 > > to another host2:port2 instead. Is this possible with natd? > > I have experimented a little bit but I only get it conncted > > to host2:port1... > > Yes, you have to set up redirections. Of course you'll never be able to > reach host2:port1 once you set it up. It's detailed on the natd man page. That would mean that I have to redirect host1 to host2 and port1 to port2, right. I didn't find that in the natd man page... Also, if host2:port1 can't be reached anymore, that would be a problem here. Thanks anyway, -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805120453.GAA10057>