Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 12:57:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sfork()? Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980819124919.12449D-100000@terra> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980819121409.19467A-100000@bright.fx.genx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Aug 1998, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > yes, evil evil evil man pages. :) > and, actually John Dyson told me about rfork, i thought it was "fixed" > though. OK, now I am lost. I just looked at -current kernel source and see that freebsd rfork does not split the stack. What's funny is my old ca. 1994 rfork for freebsd does split the stack. In fact I now wonder if my design was not somewhat nicer, since it does split the stack and requires no user-land assembly code. I'm still running 16 nodes with that old OS and old rfork and I'm going to not have fun upgrading them with -current rfork ... now what? ron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.980819124919.12449D-100000>