Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 17:41:08 -0800 From: Paul Traina <pst@juniper.net> To: Chris Timmons <skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu> Cc: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upgrading GNATS on freefall Message-ID: <199901020141.RAA13518@red.juniper.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Jan 1999 12:39:09 PST." <Pine.BSF.3.96.990101123634.26439C-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.990101123634.26439C-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu>, Chris T immons writes: > > I think it would be a good idea; maybe Paul Traina has a word of wisdom to > contribute(?) > > Also - it would probably be a good idea to try the latest bits against our > database someplace else before doing it on freefall... > > -c > > On Thu, 31 Dec 1998, Steve Price wrote: > > > No we don't use customized states. In fact the version of > > GNATS that we are using doesn't support this feature very > > well. I suppose now would be as good a time as any to bring > > our version back up to speed. Any objections to letting me > > upgrade GNATS on freefall? One of the bigger problems is > > that the index of PRs triples in size, so anybody mirroring/ > > CVSup'ing the GNATS database will see another ~1MB of data. Anyone mirroring gnats probably shouldn't care about 1mb of data, and the expanded index really does help query performance a lot. I had a 1.104 ready to go for freefall some time ago, but I've now lost track of any/all local changes that were made, so I don't know how much the gnats on freefall actually differs from the output of the port anymore. Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901020141.RAA13518>